On Feb 13, 2008 5:16 PM, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
Another one bites the dust!
If traditional encyclopedia's are going to start placing all their content free to access online, then Wikipedia has already won (even if this might hurt the German version in web traffic).
Well.. Thats one way of thinking about it.. but I'm not so sure.
Wikipedia is much more than just an encyclopedia available at no cost to people with internet access. Wikipedia is free content. You can take the content, transform it into other things, put it in other mediums.. change it... etc.
Other people might make arguments about the importance of the transparency that Wikipedia's revision control offers, or the benefits of accepting input from a broad audience.
.. So even if all existent encyclopedias were always available for reading at no cost on the web there would still be a lot of reasons for Wikipedia to exist.
However, a lot of people emphasize Wikipedia as a "no cost online encyclopedia" and events like this highlight why advertising Wikipedia in this way is a mistake: If people only think of Wikipedia as a "no cost online encyclopedia" then incremental steps like Brockhaus' may be misunderstood as something the reduces the value provided by Wikipedia.
Of course, Brockhaus is not the first commercial encyclopedia to allow online access at no cost. So really that hasn't been something that made Wikipedia unique for a long time.
Cheers.