On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
So you're saying that if WR were actually notable, and if we had an article on it, then that would justify having a link to the page. When else would we link to it, outside of that unlikely circumstance?
If the site was notable enough for inclusion, then yes, it should have a link back, the same as any other web enterprise. That's not even really a question, is it?
Not really, but the odds of that site becoming notable are pretty low.
For other circumstances, it was alleged by some in Gracenote's RFA that he was a Wikipedia Review poster. Where was the evidence? Without evidence, it was basically poisoning the well, and that poor guy's name. E-defamation, or wikifamation, I suppose.
Are you asking whether or not it was true, or making a point about linking to his posts on WR?