Raphael Wegmann schrieb:
David Gerard schrieb:
What you mean is "I can't get my way, no-one agrees with me and I can't produce any evidence for my assertions when called on them - It must be an ADMIN CONSPIRACY."
Do I really have to guide you to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muhammad&diff=192159520&ol...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad/images
It happens all the time, that admins use their privileges to gain advantage in a content dispute. I complained about it many times, but no admin ever lost his admin status over it. The only reaction I usually get is: "The admin should have asked another person to do it for him."
RfCs on admins don't work either. In-groups usually defend each other against out-groups. That isn't conspiracy, it's sociology.
David Gerard schrieb:
http://www.slweekly.com/index.cfm?do=article.details&id=37C948F3-14D1-13...
Nice one to Cool Hand Luke.
That's exactly what I expected. Divert the topic when it becomes inconvenient.