On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 14:24:33 -0400 jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
The last time you argued for "simple and verifiable fact", they were of the "everybody knows it's true" and "it's obvious" sort, but not the kind that could actually be found in any reliable sources.
"The foreskin is erogenous" ?
Actually that can be found in reliable sources.
So you're saying... WP's priority is to be neutral rather than factual? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple of things.
So you're saying... your priority is to invent strawman arguments for me rather than address the issues? Are you... Hmm... I see, that explains a couple of things.
Actually I meant to be ad hominem, like you were and still are. Let me try again:
"Adress the issues"? I can't change that you don't like facts.