On Nov 22, 2006, at 11:47, Puppy wrote:
The email which started this thread talked about "women's subjects" such as blow dryers and curling irons, and that was written by a female, yes? That's horrifying to me.
I meant to dismiss the idea of subject coverage; to say that they didn't have equal coverage, but that's not really an issue. Of course it didn't work... and I'd say my tact was off, and for that I apologize. I merely meant that if we had a significant teenage female editing base as we do male, these subjects would perhaps be neglected less.
However! The editorial aspects of women's roles as editors as it plays into policy is far more interesting and pertinent.
--Keitei