-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Snowspinner wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 9:31 PM, James D. Forrester wrote:
We've been doing this for two whole years now. Couldn't some of the people who - despite **not a single change or new statement made in the past month** have all of a sudden started protesting (and, I must point out, entirely justifiably) - have actually tried to start a real discussion, instead of a point-by-point aimless hybrid nothingness of a set of discussions randomly and uselessly lumped together.
In practice? Probably not.
Ha. Well, even so, I would like to apologise for that rant of mine. It was foolish of me to post it; I would like to blame it on being both very tired and greatly distressed by the sudden rise in people who are interested in the rather tricky matter of how to chose the appointments to the Committee as compared to the past year as I've been talking to people and trying to find someone, anyone who actually cares, but that would be ducking the blame, and I wouldn't want to do that.
I'm sorry, especially to anyone who might have felt that I was attacking them. That was not my intent, and certainly is not my motive in general.
Yours sincerely, - -- James D. Forrester Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]] E-Mail : james@jdforrester.org IM (MSN) : jamesdforrester@hotmail.com