On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, geni wrote:
Of course, now that it's in a published book, we can use that as a source.
And we can't reject it on the grounds that it's a mistake taken from Wikipedia, because we don't have a reliable source stating it's a mistake.
This has happened before. We apply IAR.
I was alluding to the Tessaiga example, where no IAR was applied.
IAR doesn't work too well when there are guideline wonks who want the guideline followed at any cost.