Sam Korn wrote:
However, I do in general disagree that policy (or at least guideline) couldn't be bypassed when it is for the best for the encyclopdia as a whole. That should be our target, not slaveishly following guidelines for their own sake.
Oh, I agree with that, especially for guidelines. However, in this particular case I figured "there must be something wrong with this" back when I first stumbled across the category and only later when it turned into a debate did I go around and find the specific guidelines that I felt applied here. Even if there were no guidelines on this subject I'd still be arguing that this isn't IMO an appropriate category to have in the main category network.