On 31/05/07, Will Beback will.beback.1@gmail.com wrote:
There are serious issues regarding "attack sites." My regrettable response to this one site should not derail the discussion of the general topic. I acknowledge over-reacting and suggest that the better definition of "attack site" will minimize similar errors. Again, my apologies to the community for any disruption.
I suggest throwing out notions that "all links to attack sites shall be removed", however phrased.
It's a matter of usage, not the mere fact of the link.
- d.