Doesn't mean there won't be anything now.
Anyway, "Reliable Sources" seems to be a very flexible phrase around WP. If we didn't have Notability to fight about, we could have the exact same fights there. We''ve already redefined N this year to mean N for over a year if it's a living person, regardless of the number and status of the sources, and I suppose we could define RS to mean blog sources only for people whom we approve of--we've been using them freely for science fiction and Unix/Linux people.
On 11/15/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 16:30:27 +0000, "James Farrar" james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
Having an article because they hate us is no better than not having one because they hate us.
[[Daniel Brandt]], for instance...
(OK, technically we don't have an article on him not because he hates us, /per se/, but because after 14 AFDs reasonable people got bored with the circus and threw in the towel.)
Got good, non-trivial biographical sources about Brandt? I know where to find deletion review.
Brandt's article was deleted for lack of sources.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l