On 31/05/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/30/07, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 30 May 2007 at 12:30:18 -0400, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I can't think of any occasion where such a link would be beneficial to the project. What exactly did you have in mind?
Then you're not thinking hard enough. Plenty of reasons have been discussed here, in other places where this debate has proceeded, and in my essay on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dtobias/Why_BADSITES_is_bad_policy
That looks like a long essay about BADSITES, a strawman policy. I'm not sure how it relates to my questions, though.
Then you are reading selectively. People are talking sweet reason then removing links like rabid weasels in a manner that looks, walks and quacks like BADSITES. And that's the problem.
You're using Gmail. Please click "Expand all" and actually read the thread before offering your valuable thoughts, so as not to waste others' time.
- d.