Puppy wrote:
Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Puppy wrote:
Alphax (Wikipedia email) wrote:
Puppy wrote:
<snip>
This is not to say that improving and expanding such articles is not desirable - after all, we wish to be the premier source of general information on everything - but it is not due to gender bias, and to imply that it is to me is reinforcing the "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".
Actually, your argument here is serving /that/ purpose quite well.
? Either I'm misunderstanding you, or I've just been insulted.
You're not helping your cause...
Then I've been insulted. Thank you for clarifying that for me. I hoped I was merely misunderstanding your intent. It is entirely possible you have misunderstood me; if you confine yourself to making sarcastic remarks and insulting me, I cannot judge and cannot clarify for you. What purpose do you intend your insults to serve, or do you merely enjoy insulting others without any sort of constructive criticism or meaningful dialogue?
Women arguing on this list reinforces the view of "woman-as-empty-headed-shallow-person".