On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:53 PM, geni wrote:
On 16/11/2007, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/11/2007, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
We have no policy that says that we can't have spoiler warnings. We have a "last edit standing" consensus. Those are by definition unstable and unenforcable.
Indeed. If people really wanted spoiler warnings, they'd be back.
No. People may want them but they don't want that level of conflict. Victory through fear. Yes it's effective in the short term.
Nothing about the six month spoiler debate has led me to believe that the proponents of spoiler warnings have any particular desire to avoid conflict.
-Phil