That's been there for quite some time. I remember "organization" (it might've been "group" then) being part of A7 when I was very first admin, and that's coming up a year now. Regardless, I certainly don't -mind- seeing it less limited, I'd like to see sourcing requirements grow some teeth, and for minimum quality standards to grow some too. There really are a lot of articles done on organizations which assert no notability, I see nothing wrong with speedying them.
On Jan 20, 2008 10:46 AM, David Goodman dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
The term "organization" was put in by stealth or accident a few months ago. Before that, the types of articles under A7 were much more limited.
On Jan 20, 2008 3:51 AM, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Todd Allen wrote:
If it's an organization, of course A7 applies. Otherwise, we could say that any company with a physical address is a "location" and exempt from A7.
But what's the article actually _about_? If there's some company that is generally considered to be non-notable, but they are headquartered in a 500-foot-tall tower that's made of cheese, it seems quite reasonable to have an article about the tower even if we don't have one about the company itself.
(Well, as reasonable as possible for someone such as myself who's quite dubious about the value of the concept of "notability" in general - I'm trying to put myself in deletionist shoes here.)
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l