Oh, okay.
On 7/25/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 25/07/07, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
David, it's interesting that you mention a "magazine-style" piece. Did
you
read the NYTimes Magazine article on Wikipedia a couple weeks ago? That
was
a much more valid and considered piece of journalism than this. You're absolutely right about the style of both pieces, they aren't digging for
a
scoop, they're reporting on the progress of the subject. But just
because it
isn't investigative doesn't mean it has nothing of value to say.
I meant that it is what it is and was ideally tuned to its audience. They certainly put in the effort and I think they got a pretty good result.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l