Delirium wrote:
Mark Richards wrote:
Yes, anything verifiable and factual should. 'Notable' is just someones POV about what they think is important.
I think you inclusionist folks severely underestimate just how much ridiculous stuff is verifiable and factual. I could start typing in entries for everyone who died in Atlanta each die, using the obituary section of the local newspaper as a source, and these are verifiable and factual. There are plenty of "human interest" stories published in the paper, like "family dog saves baby from drowning!". These are verifiable and factual (verifiable in the newspaper's archives), but not notable.
How many instances can you cite of culling obituaries for material, or family dog stories? It seems pointless to generate arguments for the rejection of articles that nobody has written.
Ec