On 8/5/07, David Goodman dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
To determine which passages make the grade, the researchers analyzed Wikipedia's editing history, tracking material that has remained on the site for a long time and edits that have been quickly overruled. A Wikipedian with a distinguished record of unchanged edits is declared trustworthy, and his or her contributions are left untouched on the Santa Cruz team's color-coded pages. But a contributor whose posts have frequently been changed or deleted is considered suspect, and his or her content is highlighted in orange. (The darker the orange, the more spurious the content is thought to be.)"
That's nice but for the information to be useful to us they would have to start naming names.
—C.W.