On Jan 2, 2008 3:45 PM, Meg Ireland megireland99@gmail.com wrote:
So if Wikipedia doesn't believe it is subject to copyright, what would be the objection to using it on templates?
On 03/01/2008, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the deletion debate established that, contrary to the Band's assertions you're relying on, the actual glyphs are ancient and not subject to current copyright.
That they may have reinvented them and chosen to use them to identify themselves doesn't mean that they are in fact original and subject to copyright.
Wait a sec. The individual glyphs aren't copyrightable, no. Neither are the letters A, B, C, and D. But if I put together stylized forms of A, B, C, and D, creating a logo, then it's an original piece of art. Certainly trademarkable, I'd think.