Bryan Derksen wrote:
Charles Matthews wrote:
But the whole point of the BLP policy is to have a minimum standard of inclusion for topics (excluding the prurient, and the sort of tittle-tattle that you find in low-class blogging), as well as minimum standards for sourcing.
The article went through AfD twice, the issue of whether the topic's worthy of inclusion is not particularly doubtful.
Ah., that wasn't what I was meaning here - I was meaning the inclusion or not of sub-topic areas in a biography, not the question of whether the biography itself should be in Wikipedia. Sorry for the confusion caused.
Charles