On 25/08/06, Cheney Shill halliburton_shill@yahoo.com wrote:
That was slimvirgin's claim, not mine.
sorry, it wasn't clear from your formatting ... it's sometimes hard to tell in your posts which bits are yours and which bits are quotes.
I have no interest in an argument over whether Britinnica is better, more NPOV, etc. I asked slimvirgin to provide a positive outside example that exhibits NPOV. Such as, "Zombietimes.com consistently represent the best cases of NPOV", as opposed to, "On a sunny day with a blue sky, no clouds, and no bugs, Fox News can provide a fair forecast for the next hour". I appreciate you taking the time to respond. I take it it's not representative of the "average" diligence that Wikipedia puts into content review.
I think we're improving. To credit Slim, she's working her butt off on living bios. Even if she errs a bit toward sympathetic point of view. But they're getting cleaned up much better than they were this time last year. Because they're treated as important. Which, arguably, they are; but mostly we have a lot of volunteers who think they are. And it's all good work, so that's good.
- d.