I regret my poor choice of terms in my last mail, and the tired state during which I wrote it.
The point was that if we are balanced in our approach we should regard all extremists as equally reprehensible, and that merely being one of a designated reprehensible character (as such designations are too often subjective) should not preclude one from participating in the project. My definition of a "reprehensible view" (substituting for an unreasonable term) is simply anyone which considers anyone else inferior. Ironically, this would seem to include myself, as I am guilty of using (for sake of rhetorical emphasis) the very kind of reprehensible terms which I sought to oppose in principle.
SV
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com