I temporarily restored the page so I could retrieve its source, which I have pasted below. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
'''Full Nice Handbag Co''' is a handbag exporter and manufacturer in [[Hong Kong]]. It was established in [[1992]]. Its range of products include ladies handbags, unisex casual bags, travel bags, backpacks, shoulder bags, cosmetic bags, evening purses, natural & paper straw bags, and sports bags. Its managing director is Raymond Leung.
Perhaps special attention needs be paid to the interesting name of the company. It is an English translation of the original Chinese name of the company, and is arguably both literal and phonetical. For traditional Chinese businesses it is more common to have names using words like "Joyful", "Full", "Prosperous" than to use the names of the founders/owners of the company.
==External link==
*[http://www.fullnice.com Official Website of Full Nice Handbag Co]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* (cur) (last) 22:11, 23 Oct 2004 Pcb21 * (cur) (last) 07:40, 10 Jun 2004 147.8.219.50 * (cur) (last) 20:09, 1 Jun 2004 Everyking m (oh, i see they do spell it that way) * (cur) (last) 20:09, 1 Jun 2004 Everyking m * (cur) (last) 18:46, 1 Jun 2004 Pcb21 m (fmt) * (cur) (last) 06:07, 1 Jun 2004 Andris ({{subst:vfd}}) * (cur) (last) 06:05, 1 Jun 2004 130.88.185.84
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Guanaco
Daniel P.B.Smith wrote:
The actual article in question was (full text):
"Full Nice Handbag Co is a handbag exporter and manufacturer in Hong Kong. It was established in 1992. Its range of products include ladies handbags, unisex casual bags, travel bags, backpacks, shoulder bags, cosmetic bags, evening purses, natural & paper straw bags, and sports bags. Its managing director is Raymond Leung."
I have just submitted it to http://jnana.wikinerds.com
I simply cannot believe that it makes very much difference one way or the other whether this article is in Wikipedia. I suggest that Pcb21 consider NOT resubmitting it and I also suggest that if he does RickK and others should just look the other way and NOT list it on VfD. Let's try not to go off onto grand crusades on principle on things that just don't really don't matter that much.
What i said last time was: "Strong NEUTRAL.... There's no very good reason for it to be in Wikipedia, and there's no very good reason for it not to be in Wikipedia. IMHO it is silly to be expressing any strong opinion about it either way, and silly to be getting overly worked up about it. ... I don't care. I vehemently don't care. All be the same in a hundred years, that's what I say."
Or, as Samuel Butler wrote in "The Way of All Flesh:" "it matters little what profession, whether of religion or irreligion, a man may make, provided only he follows it out with charitable inconsistency, and without insisting on it to the bitter end. It is in the uncompromisingness with which dogma is held and not in the dogma or want of dogma that the danger lies."
-- Daniel P. B. Smith, dpbsmith@verizon.net "Elinor Goulding Smith's Great Big Messy Book" is now back in print! Sample chapter at http://world.std.com/~dpbsmith/messy.html Buy it at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1403314063/
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l