On 2/1/03 2:09 AM, "Jonathan Walther" krooger@debian.org wrote:
I have to rise to Ed's defense. I have only seen Ed trying to make sure all sides of the story are represented. Presenting global warming as a scientifically proven "fact" is disengenous, dishonest, and unethical. It is a popular theory, yes. But it is also a controversial one. I have every confidence in Ed's neutrality.
Anthropogenic global warming, by the standard scientific definition of "fact", is a fact.