Oh, come off it, that's ridiculous (I assume you're all still talking about attack sites). Attack sites cannot possibly be relevant to more than a score of articles. The fact that such a tiny number of articles clogs up so much drama is ridiculous. Wikipedia has much more grave problems.
Moreschi
Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:57:07 -0600 From: bryan.derksen@shaw.ca To: wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Can you all stop carrying on about whether Slate is an attack site, please?
charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
NB much of the thread is about Z commenting on Y saying that X was wrong to try to strangle the thread at birth.
This strikes me as a reasonable thing to comment on, though. This issue is one that's of great importance to the Wikipedia community. If Slate's no longer the subject perhaps change the subject header, but IMO the thread hasn't really drifted all that far.
_________________________________________________________________ Celeb spotting – Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes https://www.celebmashup.com