jayjg schrieb:
On 8/3/07, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
Steven Walling schrieb:
Removing administrator status from POV-pushers could be a start.
"rabid editing" as I correctly characterized Jayjg's edits ("extreme or fanatical support of or belief in something), especially to Israeli and Jewish subjects, is not directly analogous to bad faith POV-pushing. I'm sure Jayjg thinks he is improving Wikipedia, for Wikipedia's sake and not someone else's, when he charges about like an angry mastodon. My comment concerning his reckless editing does not mean I think he is a cabalistic POV-pusher.
I've never been an admin, and I don't want to judge Jayjg personally,
Actually, you've been doing just that.
I'd rather like to discuss the "meta"-topic (admin abuse).
but it seems that other people have/had a different view:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/FuelWagon_v....
Wow, you found a workshop section created two years ago by an editor who ended up getting banned.
You're proving the opposite of the point you are trying to prove.
I don't think so, as the RfA is remarkably missing any kind of admin self-criticism. Banning a user is the decision of admins. It doesn't necessarily mean that, anything that person said is invalid and some kind of "noise" we are not supposed to think about.