Michelle wrote:
Raphael Wegmann wrote:
May I ask you what reason you'd have stated for your block? I'd like to state beforehand, that "Image removal" is not part of the Blocking policy, and ignoring content suggestions (resp. orders) from administrators (or block warnings for not to obeying to them) is neither.
Since you've apparently read the Blocking policy, you did see the part about disruption, right? I'm fairly certain you're now just going to argue that you weren't being disruptive.
Yeah sure. "Disruption" is the loophole for administrators, who can't find any other policy, which backs their action. Can you elaborate in which way the two times I've moved the cartoons behind a link in five days, disrupted the normal functioning of Wikipedia to warrant a 7 day block?
Btw. WP:BP#Disruption states, that inserting material that may be defamatory may lead to a block, but so far nobody has been blocked for inserting the defamatory cartoons.
And for the record, you were ignoring an overwhelming consensus rarely seen on any subject (see the poll on the issue you conveniently forget about), not a few suggestions.
I wonder, whether you are familiar with the [[Wikipedia:No binding decisions]] policy. There is no reason why a 3 month old poll, which gets ignored by about 10 editors/week (if the article is not protected as it seems to be necessary most of the time), should be regarded as binding.
"There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy." (Jimbo Wales)
I wouldn't use those words btw, but I agree with them "in spirit".