--- Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Jimmy O'Regan wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
Well, the idea is that for a banned user, you
don't really have to
pay much attention to what he does -- just
revert and let other
people restore if it's any good. For non-banned
users you have to
look at each edit carefully before reverting.
Sorry if that
distinction wasn't clear.
Sorry, just couldn't pass up the chance to make a
smart ass comment.
As for the "let other people..." part - that's
what I have tried to do
with Michael's stuff for a while, and it's lead
tosome minor
disagreement; it may take a while for this
approach to gain currency.
I know the irresistable attraction of smart ass comments. Given the amount that's been written about PL one can only say that with friends like him the Palestinians don't need any enemies. :-)
Ec
To Ec: I think Jimmys point was a valid one -- namely that "banned user treatment" is not always consistent thing.
Erik wrote:
Well, the idea is that for a banned user, you
don't really have to
pay much attention to what he does -- just
revert and let other
people restore if it's any good.
I dont recall this 'practical approach' ever being codified -- it seems to me that if it *was codified, there would be some questions to deal with -- Jimmys among them.
-S-
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com