Jim Trodel said:
==QUESTION=Why is the compromise offered by those that find such material offensive, i.e. "To not include it inline but make it accessible by a link" not considered a reasonable?
I don't know anyone who doesn't think it's reasonable. Inlining is far better, however, for technical reasons that I outlined earlier. Hopefully it will be generally possible in a not-too-distant future version of Wikipedia to let the user control what he sees using server-side controls instead of his browser controls; I do not expect this to appease those who seem to want a bowdlerpedia, however.