--- kosebamse@gmx.net wrote:
...regarding the quality of our work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kosebamse/Twenty-random-pages_test
Plus ça change, plus cest la même chose. Kosebamse
I think it's worth making a distinction between the quality of randomly-chosen articles, and the quality of popular articles. It's hard to know, of course, but I'd doubt that many of the articles on your list would be getting more than a handful of readers every month. It's quite possible that the average quality of Wikipedia articles is staying the same (as people constantly add new stubs / fancruft etc), while the average "Wikipedia experience" of a reader goes up.
-- Matt
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com