On 4/3/07, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
IMO it's looking more and more like you just wanted to find excuses to back up the removal of some content you didn't like. You may win individual battles that way but if you really want to rid Wikipedia as a whole of fancruft then I'd suggest debating _fancruft itself_ rather than trying to warp other unrelated policies to the task. You'll just wind up annoying people and possibly causing unintended side effects.
I suspect Guy knows quite well that project consensus does not back him as far as he'd like on the 'fancruft' issue.
Unfortunately the end result is that topics disliked by some editors who think they shouldn't be in an encyclopedia are subjected to stricter interpretations of Wikipedia policies than those in subject areas not normally contentious.
-Matt