Hi Fred!
How comes that you consider them to be Islamists?
It is not political at all, if you disagree
to an insult on your personal belief.
Why don't you first consider the question of how
to deal with users who compile a list, which
"could have been the basis for a legitimate
request for reconsideration of the decision",
or whether it is correct to censor such a list?
--
Raphael
Fred Bauder wrote:
> Good question. This was described as a "hit list". It certainly was a
> list of people who were carrying out a legitimate (if wrong-headed)
> consensus. I suppose it could have been the basis for a legitimate
> request for reconsideration of the decision. We do need to consider
> the question of how we deal with users who have strong Islamist
> points of view.
>
> Fred
>
> On May 30, 2006, at 3:26 PM, The Cunctator wrote:
>
>> Making a list of people who took an action you disagree with
>> shouldn't be
>> grounds for blocking, though.
>