"MAURICE FRANK" megaknee@btopenworld.com wrote in message news:20051011223900.19350.qmail@web86201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com...
David Gerard wrote: Also, check this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Redwolf24 An RFC written up by Wiki brah concerning Redwolf24.
quote: "For background, Redwolf has been and administrator since 22 July 2005 (for 2 mos, 3 weeks) and is Fifteen years old."
You can't believe how interesting this is. Redwolf's overuse of blocks to serve an agenda is under censure from 25 just of Wiki's unblocked population who can sign the page! after just 3 months in office as an admin! This is the chap who locked my user-page for the open reason of stopping me putting anything anti-Wikipedia on it, and how many of you backed the view "You are not entitled to anything" ?! The list of names on this RfC page think they are entitled to anything. You'd better hurry to purge them all from Wikipedia for that offence, before it spreads.
Are we reading the same RFC?
The only agenda obvious here, buddy, is your own. There are two "outside view" sections on that RFC, both of which condemn the RFC as invalid, endorsed by 33 and 14 users respectively as of right now.
One user suggests that Redwolf might have explained his actions more clearly. Another claims to have previously argued against blocking [[user:Wiki brah]] which does not quite fit in with his "outside view" on the latter's own RFC.
Not really seeing the support for you point of view, here...