steven l. rubenstein wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
t would be good to have some kind of understood process for how claims are first described as verifiable/unverifiable, then become verified/unverified. This process is extremely haphasard at the moment.
Steve
I agree. Do you have any concrete suggestions? You and a number of other people have made some fine points; perhaps we can move this discussion to the Verifiability talk page and start discussing how to put these ideas into practice?
Steve
Well, whatever the eventual solution is, I would expect it to involve Magnus' workflow system in some way.
-- Neil