Ok, so you're saying that undeletion doesn't need oversight, but crap deletion does? Aren't crap deletions supposed to be shot down by the community just as well-reasoned BOLD undeletions are supported?
SCZenz
On 1/23/06, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/23/06, SCZenz sczenz@gmail.com wrote:
The reason for what you call process-fetishism is letting all editors feel that they have a voice in deletion rather than just a few admins. I know we can't overdo it, but the goal is laudable.
Afd gives all a hand in the process. After I've done a resurrection it's a doddle to tag it for deletion (which sometimes I do anyhow as a matter of form). The response is usually very highly supportive. See for instance the results of the second AfDs of Tally and SuperOffice. The near-unanimous vote to keep in each case is not untypical of my resurrections. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l