David Gerard a écrit:
Anthere (anthere9@yahoo.com) [050115 12:01]:
What you describe as an ideal and fair situation was exactly what was NOT done. And exactly what I comment on. Till yesterday, the information on landing and on the probe was entirely in the mission article. Even today, most of the information was still in the mission article, not on the landing one. To such a point there is currently no wikipedia reference on the net about the landing article. Wikipedia reference is on the mission article. What you explain makes sense. It was not what was done.
er, {{sofixit}}?
- d.
Funny...
Yeah, I fixed it.
But my friends lost a bit of faith in our so called neutrality policy.
You have to realise that many europeans were looking for news this evening. And many found our article I suppose. They are not editors. They did not fix it. They just *saw* a situation that appeared biaised to them. They were impressed by the report. They were not impressed by the neutrality.