On 5/15/07, Todd Allen toddmallen@gmail.com wrote:
But that aside, it should still be deleted. There's a good reason to require a significant amount of independent sourcing. First-party sources may be biased, promotional, inaccurate, incomplete, technically correct but deliberately misleading, or any combination of the above.
They may be. And they may not. And by providing an alternative to bare-faced first-party sources, we are doing the world a favour.
Steve