Ilmari Karonen wrote:
Steve Bennett schrieb:
I would be curious to know - not necessarily with examples - whether we have had legal threats related to articles that did meet WP:V. That is, we published something which was by all accounts true, and had verifiable sources to back it up - and yet was deemed offensive by some miffed party.
Before anyone else gets to point this out, let me note that the situation appears to be somewhat more complicated than my cursory examination of the page history at first suggested.
(Essentially, it seems only some of the disputed information has been restored with sources; other parts appear to have indeed been false. What confused me was that the part that was removed by Jimbo was among the former.)