On 6/17/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/07, Joe Szilagyi szilagyi@gmail.com wrote:
Let's tell the truth, eh? I was banned for pointing out repeatedly when
the
emperors have no clothes on, and thrown on the sacrificial MONGO pyre.
Yes, it's true, everyone who was banned by ArbCom was actually innocent, they're all just pointing out the festering corruption at the top...
Of course not, and misdirection won't work, here. I was blocked because no one else could be for what happened to MONGO. I was blocked for daring to demand that people be held to identical standards, for daring to argue vigorously for the retention of the ED article on AFD.
Perma ArbCom bans for "tenditious editing" on a lone AfD and DRV? Harassing MONGO, perhaps, which I spectacularly demonstrated that all the 9/11 "truther" articles I supposedly followed him to I had either created myself, or edited weeks/months BEFORE him? The edits are all right there, in proof.
And
my only alternate accounts were freely admitted to, by me.
In advance?
The sock policies NEVER required this, and you know should know that. When asked about my first account in ArbCom, I immediately said, yep, that's me. When someone mistakenly overturned my Right To Vanish on the second that had been granted by Jimbo himself and known to several admins already, I e-mailed a wide array of admins that I knew, and arbiters, asking for it to be re-applied. Which it was. I was many shades of vocal when I edited, and I was hardly stealthy. All my edits on all three accounts all focused on the exact same things, so it's not like it was hard to sort out they were me: Connecticut, making sure 9/11 articles were sourced/NPOV, Seattle, online computer games, computer science, animation, bluegrass music, comic book films; somewhat inclusionist on AfD; calling for uniform application of policy. Kind of a unique signature.
Regards, Joe http://www.joeszilagyi.com