Eclecticology manages, somehow, to thow in the phrase "is completely contrary to any spirit of compromise" to a post above.
This is an extraordinary thing to say when he is fresh back from - let's not put too fine a point on it here - unilaterial vandalisim on a major scale, even stooping to cut-and-paste page moves.
Mate, there is ALREADY a well-established compromise, has been for quite some time, which, although it is not by any means completely satisfactory to me or to many of the other fauna people, has been honoured by everybody except YOU.
An anon or a newbie who behaved as you did the other day would have had his IP blocked immediately.
So please don't insult people like Jim - who, by the way, has done far more work on fauna than you ever will, and who has behaved with decency throughout - by bandying that "compromise" word around as if it was your own invention, and as if you you were willing to abide by the terms of the compromise which you knew all about the whole time.
The fauna pages were an area of the 'pedia where there was no longer any contention, and no ill-feeling. Until your unilaterial "I don't care about the consensus, I'm going to do it my way" decision the other day, it was an area where everybody was working together happily and productively. Now, PLEASE, get out of the road and let those of us who are doing the work *do* the work.
Tony
(Tannin)