On 29/03/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:49:07 +0100, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Answering "this blog is not crap" with "lots of blogs are crap" is unconvincing as an argument.
Just as well I didn't, then.
No, though several people have.
It is, however, a primary source. Which secondary sources have picked this up?
Ya got a point there. I must note of course that not having an article on [[Barbara Bauer]] just yet is not a great loss to Wikipedia - being as it's an encyclopedia, not a newswire. (Perhaps someone could write it up for Wikinews ...) The example of [[Brian Peppers]] is instructive - after a year not existing, people realised "oh yeah ... this is a pretty crappy article on a really not very notable subject."
- d.