Zoe-
So then you're in favor of moving Christopher Columbus to Cristobal Colon,
No, because that name is used neither by scholars nor the public. As I wrote, I am not opposed to anglicization, and anglicization is by itself not unscientific. (There are reasonable arguments that can be made against it in the case of European languages, but I do not subscribe to those arguments.) If there exist two different English terms, however, the one which is correct should in most cases be used, provided it has already been adopted by scholars.
Regardless, we have found a compromise for the Pennsylvania article, so I will no longer use it as an example. Ockham's Razor, on the other hand, should be moved to that title. Using "Occam's Razor" in the title and "Ockham's Razor" in the text is just plain silly.
Regards,
Erik