I agree, and think that pages should be protected far more easily than a user should be blocked. The current rigid, tie-our-hands protection policy seems to force people to think in terms of arbitration and blocking, rather than protecting. This in turn makes the arbitration commitees job harder, I think, wheras the proactive settle it on the page approach seems more wikifaithful.
S
--- Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Try sending an email, before taking an extreme step? (Blocking for a story simply about title changes and redirects _is_ an extreme step; you allege POV editing also. This may be annoying, but blocking?)
Charles
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail