Durova wrote:
Their main advantage in the current market is that their content is vetted. Question is whether they can afford the staff to keep up with submissions, and whether that value added is worth the price they charge for it. The market seems to be saying no. And if they walk away from that strategy what other working model is there?
Imagine: If each active Wikipedian chose to submit a single perfectly legitimate change to the EB website their system could quickly be overwhelmed.
Ec