On 4/1/06, NSLE (Wikipedia) nsle.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
As one of the four opposers he asked votes not be counted, I personally note that his self-nom just noted the number of his edits, how long he's been here, and that he'd never been blocked. I opposed based on not enough information given. Regarless of whether it's a self-nom or not, I'd think just plainly saying "I've (This user's) never been blocked in my (their) X months here and have (has) Y edits and thus I want (they deserve) to be an admin" would not get anyone the mop and bucket.
What more information did you want, other than access to his total edit history? If you don't have the time to go and analyse his contributions, that's one thing, but I don't see the justification for voting "oppose" for such a thing?
Steve