Beit Or on the talk page pointed out in his GA review that the Encyclopaedia of Islam (perhaps the best source for Islam-related wiki articles) describes the events leading up to the Conquest of Medina, stating that it mentions that tribal proxy warring contributed to the breaking of the treaty. This was a notable opinion I had overlooked, and I immediately inserted it into the article. Nowhere does it mention that the treaty was a guise under which an army could be amassed. In fact, the majority of academic scholarship does not endorse this view from what I know. To then defend an extremely subjective edit through equally subjective research doesn't say many positive things about how you are approaching this whole dispute in general.
Conquest of Mecca*, sorry.