On 20/09/2007, Wily D wilydoppelganger@gmail.com wrote:
The "Oh, it's just WilyDisagoatfucker.blogspot.com, there'll never be any encyclopaedic reason for wanting to link to it" been proven false three times that I know of. People worried about the unclear language in what's going on are not overreacting.
Cheers, WilyD
Erm, under what circumstances would an article on which such a website is a major component be so notable that there would be a huge hole in the encyclopaedia if the whole article were deleted?
I really don't care how much people bend the definition of notability on harmless topics - be strict, be loose, whatever - but when the topic is potentially harmful, one should be strict. In other words, anything BLP.