Oskar Sigvardsson wrote:
On 3/6/07, Ron Ritzman ritzman@gmail.com wrote:
If a user tries to edit a page and can't because he is blocked, whether he deserved it or not it's an insult to his intelligence to tell him it was "cleanup" by a "janitor". I came to this list a few years ago because I was blocked for a month, my whole ISP was because of one vandal with an army of sock puppets and a slew of throwaway ISP accounts. You are not going to get me to believe that drastic action was done by the guy who mops the server room floor.
I say continue to call them what they are, "Administrators".
This is exactly right, they are administrators in all of the classical computer science senses of the word. But I would also argue that they are in a way "part of the administration", since they are trusted with making some tough administrative decisions, such as AfDs. I don't think that the word "administrator" implies any sort of extra editorial power though. since they only administer (wow, I've bent that word backwards and forwards for this post, huh) the site. Plus, "janitors" would sound really stupid, especially in newspaper articles.
"Janitors" is somewhat self-deprecating; "administrators" can seem pompous. If we are able to laugh at ourselves, that can be a very attractive feature.
Ec