On 9/23/05, Stan Shebs shebs@apple.com wrote:
You could always ask, and if there are those for whom my upload gallery is not blindingly obvious as a holding/tracking area, I could certainly add a note to the top of it. Seeing as how I'm the person doing the physical labor of preparing the scan and postprocessing the image, I don't think it's too much to ask that my process be accommodated, rather than "assuming bad faith" as was suggested. I've been very conservative on deciding whether any given stamp image was PD or fair use - just deleted all the Israeli stamps on commons after researching their copyright status for instance - so it borders on the insulting to suggest that I don't take any of this seriously.
Stan
Phroziac wrote:
How would we know if it was uploaded in anticipation? Why do you insist on having it your way?
On 9/22/05, Stan Shebs shebs@apple.com wrote:
Kelly Martin wrote:
Several of us are now speedily deleting nonfree images that have no article references on the grounds that an image that is not being used logically cannot be being used as fair use.
I would appreciate it if you would take the trouble to see whether an image was uploaded in anticipation of article use. For instance, I often upload postage stamp scans in batches, and it may be a period of weeks before I write all the articles that will use the uploaded scans. You're not doing anybody a service by deleting these beforehand, nor are you incentivizing me to create the articles more quickly or to write first and upload later - more likely I'll just stop writing.
Stan
You could just add a note to those images to let others know about your plans and more importantly tell about the copyright status of the image. If both of those are mentioned, deleting admins will check with you before deleting anything.