--- geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/06, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/21/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
'''and your objective'''.
I don't like that phrasing. "And the project's
objective", maybe.
Otherwise if your objective is to disrupt, or to
POV-push, or to ...
Err in that case the cynical side of me would rather you ignored our guidelines since it would make it less work to neutralise you.
From the articles I've worked on, all too often the people
are taking the YOUR-objective approach and treating the article as if it's theirs and any changes are a challenge to THEIR objective, which they now view as the article's objective. That makes it harder for the people trying to make the content better, and it certainly interferes with policy like NPOV, WP:V, and WP:CITE when you have people clinging onto what they feel is their hard, well-intentioned (i.e., "good") work instead of what's best for the article. ~~Pro-Lick
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com