Of course we'd have to have a community consensus that no "person with tools" could edit the meta articles, since we'd be trying to present the actual history of the project, including all the warts. Problematic. Of course it may collect all the troublesome persons into one area, so perhaps overall a good thing for the project.
In a message dated 7/19/2009 12:36:48 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, dan@tobias.name writes:
On 17 Jul 2009 17:47:49 -0400, wjhonson@aol.com wrote:
{{fact}} Can we have a naval-gazing article on the history of the policy?? Perhaps we'd be able to address questions of how it came to be.
Contact the United States Naval Observatory and get somebody there to write one.
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:51:10 -0400, wjhonson@aol.com wrote:
Evidently there are some sins which didn't exist when Dante was writing.
That's why I need to create my own "Dan T.'s Inferno" to handle them! I can corner the market!